- Lead Sponsor: Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV) / Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)
- Short Title: Opportunities for Fairness in Farming (OFF) Act
- Introduced: 2/28/2024 in House and Senate
- Last Action: H.R.1249 was referred to the House Agriculture Committee on 02/28/2024. S. 557 was referred to the Senate Agriculture Committee on 02/28/2024.
- Cosponsors:
- House – 17 (5 Republicans – 12 Democrats)
- Senate – 6 (2 Republicans – 4 Democrats)
- Endorsements: R-CALF, Organization for Competitive Markets, National Farmers Union
- Summary: The OFF Act seeks to reform checkoff programs, which take a mandatory fee from the sale of covered commodities – like milk or beef – and funnels it into public-private programs intended to promote the sale of that commodity. The OFF Act, which would ban the programs from working for specific interest groups or lobbyists in their sector – in practice, big agriculture trade groups – whose priorities might be at odds with the sector as a whole, or smaller players. Since these programs are funded by farmers, it is like funding their own demise.
Food
Moms for America is committed to advancing agricultural and family interests by advocating for policies that support farmers, ranchers, and households. Our primary focus is on crafting and endorsing legislation aimed at maintaining food safety, affordability, and abundance, which aligns with broader goals of agricultural sustainability and food security.
Food, Family and Security
H.R. 1249 / S. 557 – Opportunities for Fairness in Farming (OFF) Act
Introduced: 2/28/2024
Overview
Press Releases
Resources
Additional Food Bills
Overview
Related Press Releases
Statement on Chairman Glenn Thompson’s House Farm Bill Released Today
Competitive Markets Groups Announce Congressional Award Winners, Legislator of the Year
Competitive Markets Action Sponsors Daily Caller Foundation’s Annual Gala, Applauds Mace, Mooney, Miller, Lee, Paul, and Other Members of Congress
Patriotic Small Town Farmers Rally and Reelect Officers in Kansas City at Annual Meeting for the Organization for Competitive Markets
Fact Sheets
H.R.1249 / S.557 – Opportunities for Fairness in Farming (OFF) Act
Summary:
- The OFF Act is a true case of the “two ends of the horseshoe” coming together. Both the libertarian right and the progressive right support the OFF Act which seeks to bring accountability and transparency to corrupt USDA checkoff programs.
What does the OFF Act do?
- The bill prohibits check-off dollars, monies farmers are forced to by when they sell their commodity, from being used to lobby the government. It also requires these programs to go through an independent audit and submit their congressionally mandated financial reports on time.
What’s the Big Deal?
- The OFF is important because checkoff programs are meant to advocate on behalf of farmers. In reality, they act as trade associations for the largest packers and consolidators in the agricultural space who often work against the best interests of farmers. Furthermore, the largest checkoff programs operate under a veil of secrecy. Audits about the usage of farmer dollars are not made public to the farmers themselves. Financial reports required to be submitted to Congress are never sent. In essence, these opaque programs meant to support farmers are funding the interests which are driving them out of business.
What’s the Latest?
H.R.1249 / S.557 – Opportunities for Fairness in Farming (OFF) Act
Summary:
- The OFF Act is a true case of the “two ends of the horseshoe” coming together. Both the libertarian right and the progressive right support the OFF Act which seeks to bring accountability and transparency to corrupt USDA checkoff programs.
What does the OFF Act do?
- The bill prohibits check-off dollars, monies farmers are forced to by when they sell their commodity, from being used to lobby the government. It also requires these programs to go through an independent audit and submit their congressionally mandated financial reports on time.
What’s the Big Deal?
- The OFF is important because checkoff programs are meant to advocate on behalf of farmers. In reality, they act as trade associations for the largest packers and consolidators in the agricultural space who often work against the best interests of farmers. Furthermore, the largest checkoff programs operate under a veil of secrecy. Audits about the usage of farmer dollars are not made public to the farmers themselves. Financial reports required to be submitted to Congress are never sent. In essence, these opaque programs meant to support farmers are funding the interests which are driving them out of business.
What’s the Latest?
Additional Food Bills